You are here
Home > Análises e Opiniões > Toward a sort 1 civilization. Our civilization is quick approaching a tipping point.

Toward a sort 1 civilization. Our civilization is quick approaching a tipping point.

Toward a sort 1 civilization. Our civilization is quick approaching a tipping point.

Humans will have to result in the transition from nonrenewable fossil fuels since the main way to obtain our energy to energy that is renewable that will let us grow to the future.

Failure which will make that change will doom us into the endless governmental machinations and financial disputes which have plagued civilization for the final half-millennium.

We want brand new technologies to make sure, but without developed governmental and systems that are economic we can’t be that which we must. And what exactly is that? A sort 1 civilization. I’d like to explain.

In a 1964 article on trying to find extraterrestrial civilizations, the Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev advised using radio telescopes to identify power signals off their solar systems for which there could be civilizations of three degrees of development: Type 1 can harness all the power of their house planet; Type 2 can harvest most of the energy of its sunlight; and Type 3 can master the power from the whole galaxy.

According to our energy savings during the time, in 1973 the astronomer Carl Sagan estimated that world represented a sort 0.7 civilization on a sort 0 to Type 1 scale. (more assessments that are current us at 0.72.) Since the Kardashevian scale is logarithmic — where any boost in power usage calls for a leap that is huge energy manufacturing — we now have a ways before 1.0.

Fossil fuels won’t have us here. Renewable sources such as for example solar, wind and geothermal are a start that is good and combined to nuclear energy could ultimately get us to Type 1.

Yet the hurdles are not entirely — and even mainly — technical people. We now have a proven history of attaining remarkable clinical solutions to success dilemmas — so long as you have the will that is political financial possibilities that enable the methods to grow. Quite simply, we truly need a sort 1 economy and polity, combined with technology, in order to become a kind 1 civilization.

Our company is near. It shows how far we’ve come in the long history of our species from Type 0, and it leads us to see what a Type 1 civilization might be like if we use the Kardashevian scale to plot humankind’s progress:

Type 0.1: Fluid categories of hominids residing in Africa. Tech is comprised of ancient rock tools. Intra-group disputes are remedied through dominance hierarchy, and between-group physical violence is typical.

Type 0.2: Bands of wandering hunter-gatherers that type kinship teams, with a mostly horizontal governmental system and economy that is egalitarian.

Type 0.3: Tribes of an individual connected through kinship however with an even more settled and lifestyle that is agrarian. The beginnings of a hierarchy that is political a primitive economic unit of work.

Type 0.4: Chiefdoms consisting of a coalition of tribes into just one hierarchical political product with a dominant frontrunner at the very top, along with the beginnings of significant financial inequalities and an unit of work in which lower-class people create meals as well as other items consumed by non-producing upper-class users.

Type 0.5: their state as a coalition that is political jurisdiction over a well-defined geographic territory and its own matching inhabitants, with a mercantile economy that seeks a great stability of trade in a win-lose game against other states.

Type 0.6: Empires stretch their control of individuals who aren’t culturally, ethnically or geographically of their normal jurisdiction, with a goal of economic dominance over rival empires.

Type 0.7: Democracies that divide energy over a few organizations, that are run by elected officials voted for by some residents. The beginnings of market economy.

Type 0.8: Liberal democracies giving the vote to all the residents. areas that start to embrace a nonzero, win-win game that is economic free trade along with other states.

Type 0.9: Democratic capitalism, the blending of liberal democracy and free areas, now distributing around the world through democratic motions in developing countries and broad trading blocs including the eu.

Type 1.0: Globalism which includes global wireless Web access, with all knowledge available and digitized to everyone else. an entirely international economy with|economy that is completely global} free areas by which everyone can trade with other people without interference from states or governments. A planet where all continuing states are democracies for which we have all the franchise.

The forces at your workplace that may prevent us from making the leap that is great to a sort 1 civilization are mainly governmental and financial. The resistance by nondemocratic states to turning power over to people is considerable, particularly in theocracies whose leaders would rather we all revert to Type 0.4 chiefdoms. The opposition toward a global economy is significant, even yet in the industrialized West, where financial tribalism nevertheless dominates the thinking about many politicians, intellectuals and residents.

For tens of thousands of years, we now have existed in a zero-sum tribal globe for which an increase for starters tribe, state or country implied a loss for the next tribe, state or country — and our governmental and financial systems have already been created for used in that world that is win-lose. But we now have the chance to reside in a win-win globe and be a Type 1 civilization by distributing liberal democracy and free trade, where the clinical and technical advantages will grow. I will be positive because into the evolutionist’s time that is deep the historian’s long view, the trend lines toward attaining Type 1 status tick inexorably upward.

Wagner Cunha e Torres
Wagner Cunha e Torres
Formado em Administração de Empresa (UCSAL), Pós-graduado em Marketing (ESPM), Especialista em Gestão Fazendária com curso de Gestão Macroeconômica no FMI, de Análise de Sustentabilidade da Dívida Pública dos Estados no Banco Mundial, e de desenvolvimento de projeções fiscais e análise sobre sustentabilidade da dívida pública através do sistema Analytica. É técnico de Finanças (SEFAZ) desde 2002, Coordenador do Programa de Ajuste Fiscal do Estado de Alagoas desde 2008, Gerente de Gestão Fiscal e Estatística desde 2011.

Deixe uma resposta

Top